ACL injury & reconstruction · Chapter 4 of 5

The operation

What an ACL reconstruction involves: the graft choices, including the donor tendon grafts this practice uses often, how the graft is placed and fixed, meniscal repair, the lateral tenodesis, and the risks.

An ACL reconstruction does not repair the torn ligament. It replaces it with a tendon graft that the body then turns into a new ligament over the following year. The operation is done through keyhole portals, takes about an hour, and is usually a day procedure. What differs between surgeons and between patients is the graft, what is done to the meniscus, and whether anything is added on the outside of the knee.

The graft

Four grafts are in common use, and each has a long track record.

Hamstring tendons (your own semitendinosus, sometimes with gracilis), folded to make a four-strand cord. The commonest graft in Australia. Trade-offs: a weaker hamstring for the first year, an ache at the back of the thigh and a numb patch below the scar, and, in the Scandinavian registries, a higher revision rate than a patellar tendon graft, with a hazard ratio of about 2.3 in the Norwegian registry. The size of the tendon matters: a graft of 8 mm or less in diameter has carried about seven times the failure risk in pooled studies, and some people simply have small hamstrings.

Patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone, the central third of the tendon below the kneecap with a block of bone at each end). The most stable graft on examination, with bone-to-bone healing and the lowest revision rate in the registries. Trade-offs: more pain at the front of the knee, pain with kneeling in a proportion of patients that is the main reason people decline it, and a small loss of extension and of quadriceps strength in the Cochrane review.

Quadriceps tendon (a strip of the tendon above the kneecap). The newest of the three in common use. In meta-analyses it matches the patellar tendon for stability and failure with about a quarter of the donor-site pain, and it has failed less often than hamstring in young patients in recent pooled data. The thigh muscle is slower to switch on afterwards, and a Swedish registry has reported more re-operations for stiffness and pain, so the picture is still forming.

Donor tendon (allograft), a tendon from a tissue donor. No donor site, so no hamstring weakness, no kneeling pain, a shorter operation and an easier first few weeks. The trade-off is in how the tissue was prepared and in who receives it. Allografts that have been irradiated or chemically sterilised fail more often, and most of the data showing allograft failing more are dominated by those grafts. In the largest registry analysis, non-processed donor tendons and those with minimal irradiation had no higher revision rate than hamstring autograft. In a systematic review of non-irradiated allograft against autograft, there was no difference in failure, laxity or knee scores, with the authors noting that this applied to patients in their late twenties and early thirties. In young, high-demand athletes the picture is different: a ten-year randomised trial in military patients with a median age of 26 found 26.5% failure with non-irradiated allograft against 8.3% with hamstring, and a large prospective cohort found about five times the re-tear odds with allograft, falling with each year of age.

In this practice a non-irradiated, non-chemically-processed donor tendon is the mainstay for most patients, including recreational athletes returning to pivoting sport, at any age. It avoids the small-hamstring problem altogether, it spares the front of the knee, and it is the graft of choice in revision and multi-ligament surgery. Professional and high-level competitive athletes typically have their own patellar tendon, because the high-demand cohorts are where allograft has failed more, and a lateral tenodesis is added where the knee warrants it. The distinction is the demand on the knee, not a birthday, and the numbers on both sides are part of the consent discussion. The full evidence, both sides of it, is on Which graft is best?.

How the graft is placed

Through two or three small portals, the inside of the knee is inspected and the menisci and cartilage are treated first. The remnants of the torn ligament are cleared, keeping the tissue at its attachments where that helps the graft heal. A tunnel is drilled in the femur and another in the tibia, each placed in the footprint where the original ligament attached, because tunnel position is what decides whether the graft controls rotation and lasts. The graft is pulled through, tensioned with the knee near full extension, and fixed at both ends, with a suspensory button or a screw depending on the graft. A single bundle is standard: the Cochrane review found no clinical difference between single- and double-bundle reconstruction.

The meniscus

Half of knees coming to reconstruction have a meniscal tear, and what is done about it matters more for the knee’s long-term health than the ligament does. A tear in the vascular outer zone is repaired, with sutures passed through the meniscus, and a repair heals better alongside a reconstruction than on its own: in a population study, re-operation after repair was 9.7% with a concurrent reconstruction against 16.7% without. A tear that cannot be repaired is trimmed to a stable edge, removing as little as possible, because meniscectomy is the strongest single predictor of arthritis after an ACL injury: 50% of patients with a meniscectomy had arthritis in one pooled analysis, against 16% of those without.

A meniscal repair changes the early rehabilitation: a hinged brace and protected weight bearing for four to six weeks, and no loaded deep bending for three to four months. The combined rehabilitation guide covers it.

The lateral extra-articular tenodesis

The ACL controls rotation as well as forward slide, and in some knees a graft inside the joint does not control rotation fully. A lateral extra-articular tenodesis is an additional step on the outside of the knee: a strip of the iliotibial band is routed beneath the lateral collateral ligament and fixed to the femur, acting as a rotational check-rein. In the STABILITY trial, 618 patients aged 14 to 25 having a hamstring reconstruction were randomised to have it or not. Over two years, graft rupture was 11% without it and 4% with it, and the broader measure of clinical failure fell from 40% to 25%. The cost was more pain in the first three to six months and a slightly larger scar. A Swedish registry found no difference in unselected patients at two years, which is why it is added selectively: the young athlete, the knee with a high-grade pivot shift, the revision, and the hyperlax knee.

Anaesthetic and the day

A general anaesthetic, with local anaesthetic placed in and around the knee at the end. Where a nerve block is added, it is an adductor canal block, which gives the same pain relief as the older femoral nerve block with better quadriceps strength in the first days, and a quadriceps that will not switch on is the one thing the first fortnight cannot afford. Most isolated reconstructions go home the same day; a reconstruction with a meniscal repair or a lateral procedure sometimes stays a night.

The risks, honestly

  • Infection. About five in a thousand overall and about three in a thousand deep, in the largest registry, and higher with hamstring grafts than patellar tendon grafts (0.61% against 0.07% deep infection). An infection in a reconstructed knee is treated urgently with washout and antibiotics, and the graft can usually be saved.
  • Blood clots. A symptomatic clot in about four in a thousand. Routine blood thinners are not used after an isolated reconstruction unless you have a particular risk factor; walking from day one is the prevention.
  • Stiffness. A knee that loses its bend or, more importantly, its full extension. About 4% need a further procedure to free it, and the strongest risk factors are a knee that was stiff before surgery, a meniscal repair, and delayed rehabilitation afterwards, which is why the pre-operative program and the first fortnight matter so much.
  • Graft failure. About 4% to 5% need a revision within five years across the registries. The figure is far higher in young athletes returning to pivoting sport, where graft rupture reached 18% at five years in an Australian cohort under 20, and it is the subject of chapter 5.
  • Numbness. A patch of numb skin on the front of the shin below the scar after a hamstring graft is the rule rather than the exception; it shrinks over a year and rarely matters.
  • Donor-site problems. Kneeling pain after a patellar tendon graft; hamstring weakness and a back-of-thigh ache after a hamstring graft; slower quadriceps recovery after a quadriceps tendon graft.
  • In a growing child, disturbance of the growth plate, in about 2% to 5% of cases with modern techniques and almost always minor. See ACL injury in children and teenagers.

Your own risk profile, your age, your sport, your weight, diabetes and smoking, is part of the consent discussion. The surgeon’s job is to reduce every risk that can be reduced and to be honest about the ones that cannot.

Common questions

What happens in an ACL reconstruction?

The torn ligament cannot be sewn back together, so it is replaced with a tendon graft. Through keyhole portals, the remnants are cleared, tunnels are drilled in the thigh bone and shin bone where the original ligament attached, the graft is passed through them and fixed at both ends. The menisci and cartilage are inspected and treated at the same time. It takes about an hour and is usually a day procedure.

Which graft is used for ACL reconstruction?

Four are in common use: your own hamstring tendons, your own patellar tendon with a block of bone at each end, your own quadriceps tendon, or a donor tendon (an allograft). Each has a track record and a trade-off, and the choice is made for you on the demands you will put on the knee, your anatomy and the size of your tendons. In this practice a non-irradiated donor tendon is the mainstay for most patients, including recreational athletes at any age; professional and high-level competitive athletes typically have a patellar tendon graft.

Is a donor tendon (allograft) as good as my own tendon?

It depends on how the tendon was processed and how old and active you are. Donor tendons that have been irradiated or chemically sterilised fail more often, and the large registry and trial data that show allograft failing more are dominated by those. Non-irradiated, non-chemically-processed tendons perform like a hamstring graft in the registries and in the meta-analyses, which mostly studied patients in their late twenties and thirties. In young, high-demand cohorts, military recruits and competitive athletes, every dataset shows higher failure with allograft. This practice reads that as a question of demand rather than of age: a donor tendon is the mainstay for most patients, including recreational athletes, and professional and high-level competitive athletes typically have their own patellar tendon.

What is a lateral extra-articular tenodesis?

An extra step on the outside of the knee in which a strip of the iliotibial band is routed under a ligament and fixed to the thigh bone, to control the rotation that an ACL graft alone does not fully stop. In a trial of 618 patients aged 14 to 25 having a hamstring graft, adding it cut graft rupture from 11% to 4% over two years. It is added in selected young, high-risk patients, and it makes the first three months sorer.

What are the risks of ACL reconstruction?

Deep infection in about three in a thousand; a symptomatic blood clot in about four in a thousand; a stiff knee needing a further procedure in about 4%; graft re-rupture in about 4% to 5% within five years overall, but much higher in young athletes; numbness beside the scar in most hamstring grafts; and the risk of another injury to either knee, which is the one that matters most and is covered in the recovery chapter.

Sources

  1. Persson A et al. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004–2012. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:285–91
  2. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;9:CD005960
  3. Mouarbes D et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2019;47:3531–40
  4. Maletis GB, Chen J, Inacio MCS, Love RM, Funahashi TT. Increased risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft tissue allografts compared with autografts: graft processing and time make a difference. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1837–44
  5. Mariscalco MW et al. Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:492–9
  6. Bottoni CR et al. Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:2501–9
  7. Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ, Dhawan A. Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 2014;30:882–90
  8. Getgood AMJ et al. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces failure of hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2-year outcomes from the STABILITY study randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2020;48:285–97
  9. Wasserstein D et al. A matched-cohort population study of reoperation after meniscal repair with and without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:349–55
  10. Claes S, Hermie L, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Verdonk P. Is osteoarthritis an inevitable consequence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21:1967–76
  11. Tiamklang T, Sumanont S, Foocharoen T, Laopaiboon M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD008413
  12. Yin X, Li X, Zhao P. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2022;101:e29295
  13. Maletis GB et al. Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:1780–5
  14. Das S et al. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29,186 patients. J ISAKOS 2026
  15. Federico AA, Qiu RY, Assadzadeh GE, Mohtadi NG. Loss of motion requiring surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J ISAKOS 2026
CallBookEmail